The Value of Collaborating with Undergraduate Students on an Interdisciplinary Project
Keywords:community service-learning, collaboration model, case study, higher education, app development
In this reflective case study, an interdisciplinary collaboration among undergraduate students in a computing science course with a team of graduate and faculty researchers at the same Canadian university will be described. The paper will then outline the considerable benefits that resulted from this community service-learning approach. The paper will also delineate recommendations for others wishing to utilize a similar model in future so as to maximize the effectiveness of such partnerships.
References or Bibliography
AGE-WELL. (n.d.). AGE-WELL graduate student and postdoctoral awards in technology and aging (2017). Retrieved from http://agewell-nce.ca/training/graduate-student-and-postdoctoral-award.
Beers, P., Boshuizen, H., Kirschner, P., Gijselaers, W. (2006). Common ground, complex problems and decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(6), 529-556. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9030-1.
Bruusgaard, E., Pinto, P., Swindle, J., & Yoshino, S. (2010). “Are we all on the same page?”: The challenges and charms of collaboration on a journey through interdisciplinarity. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 39-58.
Cameson, S. (2010). Getting wisdom: The transformative power of community service-learning. Retrieved from https://mcconnellfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Getting-Wisdom-Web.pdf.
Canadian Alliance for Community Service-Learning. (n.d.). What is community service-learning? Retrieved from http://www.communityservicelearning.ca/en/welcome_what_is.htm.
Choi, B., & Pak, A. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29(6), 351-364.
Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703-722. Retrieved from http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312705055535.
Fine, M., & Kurdek, L. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. The American Psychological Association, 48(11), 1141-1147. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.11.1141.
Fischer, G., & Otswald, J. (2005). Knowledge communication in design communities. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication (pp. 213-242). Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-24319-4_10.
Gemmel, L., & Clayton, P. (2009). A comprehensive framework for community service-learning in Canada. Canadian Alliance for Community Service Learning. Retrieved from http://www.communityservicelearning.ca/en/documents/AComprehensiveFrameworkforCSL.pdf.
Keating, N. & Eales, J. (2017). Social consequences of family care of adults: A scoping review. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(2), 153-173.
Keating, N., Fast, J., Lero, D. S., Lucas, S., & Eales, J. (2014). A taxonomy of the economic costs of family care to adults. Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 3, 11-20.
Kennedy, E. (1995). In pursuit of connections: Reflections on collaborative work. American Anthropologist, 97(1), 26-33. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/682376.
Levine, J., & Moreland, R. (2004). Collaboration: The social context of theory development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 164-172. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_10.
Massey, C., Alpass, F., Flett, R., Lewis, K., Morriss, S., & Sligo, F. (2006). Crossing fields: The case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Quantitative Research, 6(2), 131-149. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794106062706.
Nissani, M. (1997). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal, 34(2), 201-217. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3.
Sinha, M. (2013). Spotlight on Canadians: Results from the General Social Survey, Portrait of caregivers, 2012. (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 89-652-X — No. 001). Ottawa ON: Ministry of Industry. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-652-x/89-652-x2013001-eng.pdf.
Rosenfield, P. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11), 1343-1357.
Snow, E., Salmon, A., & Young, R. (2010). Teaching transdisciplinarity in a discipline-centred world. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 3, 159-165. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1058336.pdf.
Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28(2), 202-213. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.016.
Tryon, E., & Stoecker, R. (2008). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(3), 47-59. Retrieved from http://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/99/87.
Turcotte, M. (2013). Insights on Canadian society, family caregiving: What are the consequences? (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 75-006-X). Ottawa ON: Ministry of Industry. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-006-x/2013001/article/11858-eng.pdf.
Wasser, J., & Bresler, L. (1996). Working in the interpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative research. American Educational Research Association, 25(5), 5-15. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176204.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Mackenzie Martin, Jacquie Eales, Janet Fast, Carlos Florentino, Megan Strickfaden
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain ownership of the copyright for their manuscript.